01
Agentic memory architecture
Design partner, ongoing
Designing the memory an agent actually needs: episodic, semantic and
procedural layers, the knowledge-graph substrate underneath them, and the
extraction-consolidation pipeline that keeps the whole thing from rotting. Plus
retrieval that does more than nearest-neighbour — graph traversal, PageRank and
community detection fused into one query.
You might want this if
- Your agent forgets things it was told last week.
- Retrieval returns plausible chunks and the agent still cannot answer multi-hop questions.
- You have a vector store and have started to suspect that is not a memory.
02
Agent identity & trust
Project or advisory
Identity for agents, and trust between them. DID methods — did:web,
did:webvh, did:webs — KERI, verifiable credentials, GLEIF vLEI, agent reputation
and trust registry design. Built from founding-engineer work on a production SSI
platform, including a COVID verifiable-credentials system taken from zero to a
live airport integration in four weeks.
You might want this if
- Your agents need to prove who they are to something that is not your own backend.
- You are designing a trust registry and want to know what breaks at scale.
- Someone said "just use OAuth" and you suspect that answer is incomplete.
03
Architecture review
Time-boxed, written findings
A senior read of an existing system, ending in a written document you can
hand to your board or your team — what is sound, what will hurt, what to do
first. Frequently the cheapest way to find out whether you need anything else on
this page.
You might want this if
- A system works but nobody can say why, or what happens next.
- You are about to commit to a data architecture you cannot easily undo.
- You need an outside opinion your team will actually respect.
04
Workshops & training
Multi-day, on-site or remote
Teaching engineering teams the material behind the books: agent
architecture, knowledge graphs as agent memory, and local-first and edge AI. The
same programme shape currently being built inside an engineering organisation
rather than assembled for a conference slot.
You might want this if
- Your team is shipping agents by pattern-matching on blog posts.
- You want a shared vocabulary before a big architectural decision, not after.
- You would rather your engineers learned this from someone who has shipped it.
How it works
- A short call to work out what you actually need — often not what the enquiry said.
- A written proposal with scope, shape and price.
- The work, with whatever cadence of contact suits you.
No price list. The right number depends on scope, duration and what the work is
worth to you, and I would rather find that out on a call than guess in public.
Where this comes from
Founding engineer at Affinidi — self-sovereign identity, DID
and Sidetree protocol work, and a COVID verifiable-credentials platform taken
from zero to a live airport integration in four weeks.
Founding engineer at Mykin.ai — a privacy-first personal AI,
with on-device semantic memory: a personal knowledge graph with vector search
and clustering, running on a phone.
Before that: Zalando, TomTom, LiveIntent. Teams of five to fifteen, systems
serving forty million customers, and three million events a minute.
The full CV → Tools I have shipped →
Start with a conversation
Tell me what you are building and what is going wrong. If I am not the right
person, I will say so and try to point you at who is.
pavlyshyn@gmail.com LinkedIn